Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Npcap OEM 1.71: After return from windows power save mode "PacketReceivePacket" and "PacketSendPacket" returns often with "ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED" #627

Closed
ha-andy opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Npcap OEM 1.71: After return from windows power save mode "PacketReceivePacket" and "PacketSendPacket" returns often with "ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED" #627

ha-andy opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@ha-andy
Copy link

ha-andy commented Sep 2, 2022

I tested the workaround i.e. skipped the first return value "1617" and called the Npcap API again after a Windows API SleepEx with a sleep time of 120 seconds. The return value was still "1617" only rarely it succeeded without error.
The network adapter is pingable during the SleepEx.

This issue is still there:
#506
dmiller-nmap pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2023
@bonsaiviking
Tie filter module and handles to base miniport ID, not filter module'…
88188f6 
…s ID. See #627
@fyodor
Copy link
Member

fyodor commented Mar 20, 2023

Thanks for the report. @bonsaiviking put in a fix (we hope) for this and it will be included in the upcoming Npcap Version 1.73 release.

@fyodor
Copy link
Member

fyodor commented Apr 6, 2023

Just as an update, Npcap Version 1.73. has been released and we believe this is fixed. So I'm closing this. But if anyone still encounters the problem, please post and we'll re-open.

@fyodor fyodor closed this as completed Apr 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fyodor @ha-andy